lurkio wrote:Thanks, Dave! Don't suppose you can check DFS 0.9 at all?
I had to burn an actual EPROM to test this. It's been a while since I've had to do that!
But it's the same behaviour as 1.21, i.e. there is no caching of the catalogue.
It would be worth a few other people trying this, just it case it somehow depends on the drive itself in some subtle way. I'm using a 5 1/4 in drive.